A bench of Justices BR Gavai and JB Pardiwala quashed an FIR lodged against a businessman, noting that the case was lodged after 14 years of the alleged incident of forgery and no date or time was mentioned in the FIR. It said that the entire case appeared to be concocted and fabricated.
The court said when a frivolous case is filed with an ulterior motive for wreaking personal vengeance, then the complainant would ensure that the averments made in the FIR/complaint are such that they disclose the necessary ingredients to constitute the alleged offence and “in such circumstances, the court owes a duty to look into the FIR with care and a little more closely”.
“Therefore, it will not be just enough for the court to look into the averments made in the FIR/complaint alone for the purpose of ascertaining whether the necessary ingredients to constitute the alleged offence are disclosed or not. In frivolous or vexatious proceedings, the court owes a duty to look into many other attending circumstances emerging from the record of the case over and above the averments and, if need be, with due care and circumspection try to read in between the lines,” the bench said.
“The court, while exercising its jurisdiction under Section 482 of the CrPC or Article 226 of the Constitution, need not restrict itself only to the stage of a case but is empowered to take into account the overall circumstances leading to the initiation/registration of the case as well as the materials collected in the course of investigation. Take for instance the case on hand. Multiple FIRs have been registered over a period of time. It is in the background of such circumstances the registration of multiple FIRs assumes importance, thereby attracting the issue of wreaking vengeance out of private or personal grudge as alleged,” the bench said.