NEW DELHI: Amid consistent rise in deaths of pedestrians and cyclists, Punjab has taken the lead among the states and UTs to implement the ‘right to walk’ by making it mandatory for all road-owning agencies, including the NHAI, to provide footpath and cycle tracks in all future expansion of roads and construction of new ones.
The state government has issued these directions following two court orders after PILs were filed at Punjab and Haryana High Court and another in the Supreme Court. The courts have sought the action taken reports on safety of pedestrians and cyclists.
As per a communication from Punjab chief secretary Vijay Kumar Janjua to Punjab government’s traffic adviser, Navdeep Asija, “in future all expansions of existing roads and construction of new roads, a mandatory provision of cycle tracks and footpaths should be made by all road owning departments and agencies”.
The letter sent last week added that all agencies such as the public works department, local bodies, NHAI and urban development departments have been instructed to prepare an action plan to construct footpaths and cycle tracks with a time frame and budget provision.
Government data show that the number of pedestrians killed in road crashes has increased from 25,858 in 2019 to 29,124 in 2021, indicating that road infrastructures don’t cater to the safety of pedestrians. The road accident report of 2022 has not yet been published.
The Supreme Court, in an interim order last year, had asked states to ensure the safety of pedestrians, cyclists by providing them separate, seamless and safe pedestrian lanes and cycle tracks.
Asija himself had filed a PIL in the Punjab and Haryana HC in 2010 seeking the “Right to Walk under Article 21” by ensuring safe facilities for pedestrians. The petition had highlighted how its common policy makers, planners, and engineers have an understanding that those on non-motorised mode such as walking and cycling have an inferior right to use public roads compared to the motor vehicles. It also flagged how there is a perception that roads are funded by motorists.
The plea before the HC had also pointed out how pedestrians and cyclists are sometimes forbidden from using a particular public road to avoid delaying motorised traffic and this has pushed the level of motorisation, especially private vehicles on roads in urban areas.
The state government has issued these directions following two court orders after PILs were filed at Punjab and Haryana High Court and another in the Supreme Court. The courts have sought the action taken reports on safety of pedestrians and cyclists.
As per a communication from Punjab chief secretary Vijay Kumar Janjua to Punjab government’s traffic adviser, Navdeep Asija, “in future all expansions of existing roads and construction of new roads, a mandatory provision of cycle tracks and footpaths should be made by all road owning departments and agencies”.
The letter sent last week added that all agencies such as the public works department, local bodies, NHAI and urban development departments have been instructed to prepare an action plan to construct footpaths and cycle tracks with a time frame and budget provision.
Government data show that the number of pedestrians killed in road crashes has increased from 25,858 in 2019 to 29,124 in 2021, indicating that road infrastructures don’t cater to the safety of pedestrians. The road accident report of 2022 has not yet been published.
The Supreme Court, in an interim order last year, had asked states to ensure the safety of pedestrians, cyclists by providing them separate, seamless and safe pedestrian lanes and cycle tracks.
Asija himself had filed a PIL in the Punjab and Haryana HC in 2010 seeking the “Right to Walk under Article 21” by ensuring safe facilities for pedestrians. The petition had highlighted how its common policy makers, planners, and engineers have an understanding that those on non-motorised mode such as walking and cycling have an inferior right to use public roads compared to the motor vehicles. It also flagged how there is a perception that roads are funded by motorists.
The plea before the HC had also pointed out how pedestrians and cyclists are sometimes forbidden from using a particular public road to avoid delaying motorised traffic and this has pushed the level of motorisation, especially private vehicles on roads in urban areas.